By William Andrew Rottschaefer
This crucial booklet brings fresh findings and theories in biology and psychology to endure at the basic query in ethics of what it potential to act morally. by way of proposing a whole version of ethical company in line with modern evolutionary conception, developmental biology and psychology, and social cognitive conception, the publication bargains a different point of view. it is going to be learn with revenue by means of a large diversity of philosophers, in addition to psychologists and biologists.
Read Online or Download The Biology and Psychology of Moral Agency PDF
Similar ethics & morality books
A examine within the most sensible culture of classical scholarship, displaying mastery of observation and scholarship in 8 languages, this booklet argues that the Ethics is quintessential to a sequence of politically orientated philosophical addresses geared toward morally mature political leaders. Bodeus's serious overview of the most important techniques to Aristotle's texts is a superb creation to the topic.
Mit Werten in der Politik verhält es sich wie mit vielen Dingen im Leben: Erst wenn sie nicht mehr da sind, wird deutlich, wie sehr sie fehlen. Der Bezug auf Werte wird in der politischen Debatte nicht immer explizit gemacht, selten werden politische Entscheidungen dezidiert mit ihnen begründet. Wenn sie aber auch implizit fehlen, wenn sie nicht mehr Leitfaden für das politische Handeln sind, dann verliert Politik ihre Substanz und ihre orientierende Kraft.
The Corsair affair has been referred to as the "most popular controversy in Danish literary background. " on the middle is Søren Kierkegaard, whose pseudonymous phases on Life's approach occasioned a frivolous and dishonorable overview via Peder Ludvig Møller. Møller used to be linked to The Corsair, a book infamous for gossip and cartoon.
Extra info for The Biology and Psychology of Moral Agency
One of my primary goals, then, is to construct and support a scientific naturalistic metaethics. In addition to these substantive contributions of the sciences to ethics, specifically to an account of moral agency, there is also the issue of the methodological connections between morality and the sciences. What are the relationships, if any, between ethical and scientific knowing? Scientific knowing is typically described in terms of observation, experimentation, the formulation and testing of hypotheses and theories, prediction, and explanation.
5 a theoretically plausible story about the phylogenesis of evolutionarily based moral capacities. 1 EVOLUTIONARY THEORY First, we must distinguish the fact of evolution —modification with descent, as Darwin called it — from explanations of evolution. Evolution can be described in terms of the changes in organisms over time that have led to the diversity of past and present life forms. These changes are reflected in such phenomena as biogeographical distribution, the order of the fossil record, the morphological and physiological similarities between past and contemporary forms, resemblances among contemporary organisms, and the adaptations of organisms to their environments (Darwin 1859; Kitcher 1985; Ruse 1986).
A relatively maximal condition on freedom would require that the reflective level be operative. A minimal one requires merely that the action performed by base-level or behavioral-level motivational systems be of the sort that a third-level intervention was possible, that is, that they not be compulsive. I argue in Chapter 6 that a more complete, as well as a more philosophically and empirically adequate account of moral agency requires the postulation of a fourth-level motivational system, a self-system.
The Biology and Psychology of Moral Agency by William Andrew Rottschaefer